Did you know?

In this paper we unify and improve some of the results of Bourgain, Brezis and Mironescu and the weighted Poincaré-Sobolev estimate by Fabes, Kenig and Serapioni. More precisely, we get weighted counterparts of the Poincaré-Sobolev type inequality and also of the Hardy type inequality in the fractional case under some mild natural restrictions. A main feature of the results we obtain is the ...The fact that a Poincaré inequality implies dimension-free exponential concentration for Lipschitz functions has a long history, dating back to work by Gromov ...In this note we state weighted Poincaré inequalities associated with a family of vector fields satisfying Hörmander rank condition. Then, applications are given to relative isoperimetric inequalities and to local regularity (Harnack's inequality) for a class of degenerate elliptic equations with measurable coefficients.DOI: 10.31559/glm2021.10.2.3 Corpus ID: 237361511; Generalization of Poincar ´e inequality in a Sobolev Space with exponent constant to the case of Sobolev space with a variable exponentin a manner analogous to the classical proof. The discrete Poincare inequality would be more work (and the constant there would depend on the boundary conditions of the difference operator). But really, I would also like this to work for e.g. centered finite differences, or finite difference kernels with higher order of approximation. Abstract. We give a proof of the Poincare inequality in W-1,W-p (Omega) with a constant that is independent of Omega is an element of U, where U is a set of uniformly bounded and uniformly ...In mathematics, the Poincaré inequality is a result in the theory of Sobolev spaces, named after the French mathematician Henri Poincaré. The inequality allows one to obtain bounds on a function using bounds on its derivatives and the geometry of its domain of definition. Such bounds are of great importance in the modern, direct methods of the calculus of variations. A very closely related ...We show that certain functional inequalities, e.g. Nash-type and Poincaré-type inequalities, for infinitesimal generators of C 0 semigroups are preserved under subordination in the sense of Bochner. Our result improves earlier results by Bendikov and Maheux (Trans Am Math Soc 359:3085-3097, 2007, Theorem 1.3) for fractional powers, and it also holds for non-symmetric settings. As an ...linear surface triangulations with boundary. The main result is a Poincare inequality in Theorem 4.2.´ As a byproduct, we obtain equivalence of the non-conforming H2 norm posed on the true surface with the norm posed on a piecewise linear approximation (see Theorem 4.3). In addition, we allow for free boundary conditions.in a manner analogous to the classical proof. The discrete Poincare inequality would be more work (and the constant there would depend on the boundary conditions of the difference operator). But really, I would also like this to work for e.g. centered finite differences, or finite difference kernels with higher order of approximation.Indeed, such estimates are directly related to well-known inequalities from pure mathematics (e.g logarithmic Sobolev and Poincáre inequalities). In probability theory, Brascamp–Lieb and Poincaré inequalities are two very important concentration inequalities, which give upper bounds on variance of function of random variables.I was wondering how can one extend this prove to prove Sobolev-Poincare inequality: $||u-u_\Omega||_{L^{p*}}\... Stack Exchange Network. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.in a manner analogous to the classical proof. The discrete Poincare inequality would be more work (and the constant there would depend on the boundary conditions of the difference operator). But really, I would also like this to work for e.g. centered finite differences, or finite difference kernels with higher order of approximation.A Poincare’s inequality with non-uniformly degenerating gradient. Monatshefte für Mathematik, Vol. 194, Issue. 1, p. 151. CrossRef; Google Scholar; Li, Buyang 2022. Maximum-norm stability of the finite element method for the Neumann problem in nonconvex polygons with locally refined mesh. Mathematics of Computation, …and the Poincare constant is basically a multiple of diameter of the domain. However in $\mathbb{R}^3$ , the only similar result for $\mathbf{curl}$ -square integrable vector fields $\v{u}$ would be:Inequality (1.1) can be seen as a Poincaré inequality with trace term. The main result of the paper states that balls are the sets which minimize the constant in (1.1) among domains with a given volume. Theorem 1.1 The main result. Let p ∈ [1, + ∞ [.poincare inequality with spectral gap 1 where 1 is the rst nonzero eigenaluev of the laplace beltrami operator with domain L= C 1(M) (in the setting with boundary take C1 0 or H 0) then we can show through fourier means or ariationalv means that Var(f) 1 1 E(f;f):in a manner analogous to the classical proof. The discrete Poincare inequality would be more work (and the constant there would depend on the boundary conditions of the difference operator). But really, I would also like this to work for e.g. centered finite differences, or finite difference kernels with higher order of approximation.

1. (1) This inequality requires f f to be differentiable everywhere. (2) With that condition, the answer is the linear functions. The challenge is to prove that. (3) You might as well assume n = 1: n = 1: larger values of n n are trivial generalizations because both sides split into sums over the coordinates.Matteo Levi, Federico Santagati, Anita Tabacco, Maria Vallarino. We prove local Lp -Poincaré inequalities, p ∈ [1, ∞], on quasiconvex sets in infinite graphs endowed with a family of locally doubling measures, and global Lp -Poincaré inequalities on connected sets for flow measures on trees. We also discuss the optimality of our results.In Evans PDE book there is the following theorem: (Poincaré's inequality for a ball). Assume 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞. Then there exists a constant C, C, depending only on n n and p, p, such that. ∥u − (u)x,r∥Lp(B(x,r)) ≤ Cr∥Du∥Lp(B(x,r)) ‖ u − ( u) x, r ‖ L p ( B ( x, r)) ≤ C r ‖ D u ‖ L p ( B ( x, r)) The ...mod03lec07 The Gaussian-Poincare inequality. NPTEL - Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru. 180 08 : 52. Poincaré Conjecture - Numberphile. Numberphile. 2 ...

If μ satisfies the inequality SG(C) on Rd then (1.3) can be rewritten in a more pleasant way: for all subset A of (Rd)n with μn(A)≥1/2, ∀h≥0 μn A+ √ hB2 +hB1 ≥1 −e−hL (1.4) with a constant L depending on C and the dimension d. The archetypic example of a measure satisfying the classical Poincaré inequality is the exponential ...We prove a Poincaré inequality for Orlicz-Sobolev functions with zero boundary values in bounded open subsets of a metric measure space. This result generalizes the (p, p)-Poincaré inequality for Newtonian functions with zero boundary values in metric measure spaces, as well as a Poincaré inequality for Orlicz-Sobolev functions on a Euclidean space, proved by Fuchs and Osmolovski (J ...2 Answers. where fΩ =∫Ω f f Ω = ∫ Ω f is the mean of f f. This is exactly your first inequality, but I think (1) captures the meaning better. The weighted Poincaré inequality would be. where fΩ,w =∫Ω fw f Ω, w = ∫ Ω f w is the weighted mean of f f. Again, this is what you have but written in a more natural way.…

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. his Poincare inequality discussed previously. Possible cause: During the past 55 years substantial progress concerning sharp constants in.